Evangelism is often thwarted by things people think but don’t talk about. Or by things people assume about truth and reality that are so taken for granted that they are not questioned. Apologetics grew out of the need to address such assumptions.
Apologetics – that is, the defense of the faith – has been the Christian weapon for defending itself from arguments against it. In earlier times it focused its strength mostly against heresy, against such claims as that there is no God, or that if there is, he is not the Christian God, or that if he is the Christian God, he is a monster, certainly not worthy of being followed or obeyed.
More recently, it has also focused on claims from outside the Christian faith. These are primarily that the Bible is not true, that it has been disproved by science and that there is no supernatural, and no supernatural explanation for anything. From within the faith, apologetics has focused on a supposed need to reconcile Christianity with science, on claims that the Bible has not been accurately transmitted to us, or that the Bible should not be taken at face-value and therefore God and his commands may be interpreted somewhat differently than plainly described in the Bible.
All such apologetics are arguments to assist people in choosing God and his son, Jesus Christ. They have no other purpose or justification. That is, the primary purpose for apologetics is to support evangelism, discipling and the church.
Now an additional branch of apologetics is urgently needed. That could be called “Lifestyle Apologetics.” Such a new branch of apologetics must not only counter the supposed facts which are used to support attacks on the faith. It must also consider the motives of those making the attacks, as well as the motives of those who would like to accept them. It must think on how to bring to light, address and change these motives.
To address these underlying, unstated motives, it must counter the unstated, wide-spread assumptions on which they are often based. Some critical ones are that living a non-Christian life is more gratifying than a Christian life, and that living in a non-Christian nation is better than living in a Christian nation. To do so, it must counter them not only intellectually, but also on a factual, historical, often statistical basis.
This calls for a new branch of apologetics, with its own thinkers, researchers, think-tanks, academics, writers and speakers. First and promptly, it calls for pioneers to lay out the basics, find and gather information, think rigorously about it and use the results to argue well.
What is the immediate, urgent need for Lifestyle Apologetics in support of evangelism and discipling? It is that motives for rejecting Christ and his commands are more powerful than ever. It is that what we would have to give up now to follow Christ seems much bigger, less reasonable and more costly than ever. It is also that we seem to have so little to gain by doing so, at least in this life. And doing so solely for the next life seems less important than ever, because of the inroads made in even the belief in a next life.
What do we have to gain, in this life, by following Christ? That question is the “elephant in the room” whenever any attempt is made to draw others to Christ. The “health and wealth” preachers have their own answer. But, aside from questions as to whether or not they are right, are there other reasons to believe that Christians are better off than non Christians, in this life, and despite any sufferings they might endure for being believers? And can these reasons be substantiated? Can they be supported intellectually, factually, historically and statistically against claims and assumptions that being a Christian is not only an unintelligent, illogical, science-defying way to live, but also an inferior and less satisfying, less beneficial way?
The answers to the last part lie in two directions. First, the internal benefits Christianity brings, such as peace, resilience, joy, contentment in spite of circumstances, and strength adequate to whatever comes. Second, the external benefits that come from obeying the commandments of God. These external benefits can be supported factually and statistically for individuals. They can be supported factually, historically and statistically for nations.
It can be shown that individuals do better and have better lives when they love God, love their neighbor, honor their parents, refrain from murder, theft, lying, adultery and fornication and envy.
It can also be shown that nations with a majority of such individuals have been those who have done the best. The reasons are fairly obvious, although complex and in need of careful scholarship to discern and support them. Much work has already been done.
If Lifestyle Apologetics becomes strong and its claims become widely known, it would be a huge support to evangelism, to discipling and to the church in every way. It would even be a basis for a political argument that nations are best served and better off when people live by God’s commands, whether they believe in Christ, or indeed any god, at all. It is actually true that people, and nations, that live by God’s laws automatically become better off. It is therefore right and praiseworthy to support the faith, even for purely secular purposes and for purely secular individuals and nations!
For believers, there is an important question: should we try to attract people to Christ because of the benefits in this life? Is that not to undercut the need to come to God out of love, simply because he first loved us? Could it not also undermine the expectation that we will suffer for following Christ, and to be patient when we do?
That is a distinction worth making. To address it, we would need to know what God thinks about it. But since the Bible says of him that he is “full of pity” and “not willing that any should perish,” and since we often see how he accepts any who come, even when it is not for the purest of reasons, perhaps we can lean more toward pity and less toward exactness for purity of motive.
We must certainly try our best to use Lifestyle Apologetics in a way that explains that whatever the benefits in this life of being a Christian, there will still be suffering and loss. But that with these come more than enough grace and strength to withstand them, and still have peace and joy in Christ that “surpasses all understanding.” That whatever may come, God’s promise to us is that “all things work together for good to those who love the Lord.” So he assures us that he will turn every evil into ultimate good for each of us.
It is factually, literally true that the benefits of the Christian life-style, in this life alone, far outweigh the downside, both for individuals and for nations. It is past time to make that case much more strongly and spread it much more widely. Now is the right time for the birth of “Lifestyle Apologetics,” for the support of evangelism, discipling and the church.
